Categories
Uncategorized

April 22, 2015

seven Swarthmore professors send a proposal for a partial fossil fuel divestment option to the Board

from SCRIBD: “During a 32-day student sit-in at Swarthmore College (see http://bit.ly/swatdiveststory) in the spring semester of 2015, a group of faculty developed a proposal and paper that the faculty at large and the Board of Managers considered. The faculty passed a resolution calling for divestment of separately managed funds from the Carbon Underground list of 200 fossil fuel companies holding the largest reserves. The Board of Managers met on May 1-2, 2015 and rejected all divestment proposals.”

https://www.scribd.com/document/265659814/Swarthmore-College-faculty-fossil-fuel-divestment-proposal-and-paper

Categories
Uncategorized

June 11, 2018

Swarthmore rejects the student referendum demanding an end to the 1991 ban

https://www.swarthmore.edu/news-events/response-to-investment-policy-referendum

Categories
Uncategorized

April 29, 2004

Swarthmore celebrates the success of shareholder activism and offers a revisionist history of the ban

https://sites.sccs.swarthmore.edu/divestmentdocuments/2020/10/05/college-pursues-socially-responsible-investing-by-alex-kalkstein-2004/

Categories
Uncategorized

May 3, 2015

fossil fuel industry lobbying group praises Swarthmore for refusing to divest

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/3/swathmore-college-rejects-divesting-from-fossil-fu/

https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2015/09/24/giving-a-gold-star-for-all-the-wrong-reasons/

https://wagingnonviolence.org/2015/05/swarthmore-rejects-student-calls-for-divestment-shows-whose-side-its-own/

Categories
Uncategorized

March 21, 2017

Administration threatens students with probation and fines for Feb sit-in

https://swatmountainjustice.wordpress.com/2017/03/21/administration-threatens-students-with-probation-and-fines-for-feb-sit-in/

https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2017/03/24/an-open-letter-to-president-valerie-smith-and-associate-dean-of-students-nathan-miller/

https://www.inquirer.com/philly/blogs/real-time/Swarthmore-students-cited-sit-in-divestment-fossil-fuels.html

Swat’s “justification” https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2017/03/23/40393/

https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2017/04/03/40546/

Categories
Uncategorized

April 23, 2015

Faculty vote in favor of fresh divestment proposal

https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2015/04/23/faculty-vote-divestment/

Categories
Uncategorized

March 19, 2021

Know the Ban, Ban the Ban II

https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2021/03/19/know-the-ban-ban-the-ban-ii-duplicitous-ban/

Categories
Uncategorized

April 19, 2013

Mountain Justice calls for an escalation of the fossil fuel divestment campaign

https://swatoverlaps.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/volume-8-issue-1/

https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2013/04/19/op-ed-no-more-business-as-usual/

Have this acompanying doc: https://swatmountainjustice.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/fossil-fuel-divestment-101_may-2013.pdf

Categories
Uncategorized

February 23, 2017

After SGO referendum, board still votes “no”

https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2017/02/23/after-sgo-referendum-board-still-votes-no/

https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2017/02/23/mountain-justice-wins-referendum-in-landslide-board-rejects-partial-divestment/

https://www.swarthmore.edu/presidents-office/feb-22-2017

Categories
Uncategorized

1991

The Board of Managers adopts the ban on ethical divestment

The ban, part of the endowment fund’s “Statement of Investment Objectives and Policies,” states: “As a matter of policy, the Investment Committee manages the endowment to yield the best long term financial results, rather than to pursue other social objectives.”

Students involved in the fossil fuel divestment campaign began referring to this policy as “the ban” after the Board repeatedly cited it to dismiss their demands. The Board has also used the ban to block other campaigns, including

  • Divestment from arms manufacturers (2001)
  • Divestment from companies involved in the Israeli apartheid state and occupation of Palestine (2009, 2019)
  • Ending the ban (2018)

Little public information about the ban and its adoption exists. The date of the ban’s adoption is not known. The Board did not offer a rationale for instituting the ban because it did so in secret. Even the investment policy which contains the ban is not publicly available.

Almost everything known publicly about the ban comes from explanations of the policy by administrators and Board members. Those explanations are short on details and sometimes contradictory.

(find more swat sources about this b/c, of course, the ban itself isn’t available nor is contemporary sources about its adoption).

https://sites.sccs.swarthmore.edu/divestmentdocuments/2020/10/05/swarthmore-college-endowment-fund-statement-of-objectives-and-policies-1997/